Friday 25 May 2012

Is it time to UNITE?

I have been a member of the Public & Commercial Services Unison (PCS) since it was founded in 1998. I did not vote for the merger that formed PCS, due to anti-democratic terms of the merger and the likelihood that the approach and policies of the then very right-wing CPSA leaders would be carried forward into the new union.
The election of Mark Serwotka as PCS General Secretary began the era of the activist led union that we have today. This very nearly did not come to pass, as the outgoing General Secretary mounted a coup to unseat Mark and take the union back to the days of right-wing domination. The coup ultimately failed, and since that time PCS has grown from strength to strength. In recent years, we have taken the high ground in the fightback against the Government’s austerity policies, dragging the TUC and more reluctant unions along behind us.
The PCS has been the most vocal opponent of the Government’s plans to slash public service pensions. The strike on 30th November 2011 saw the largest number of public sector trade union members out on strike in a generation. Sadly, on 19th December 2011, the TUC and UNSION leaderships took the decision to accept the Government’s ‘Heads of Agreement’ for public sector pension schemes. Seemingly, the PCS was left alone abandoned by our allies.
Moving forward to 2012, PCS balloted its membership for a national strike on 28th March, and this was presented on the basis that the action would be taken with other unions. Despite, receiving a commanding majority for the action, PCS’ National Executive called off the action as no other unions were prepared to take national strike action on March 28th. I, and many other colleagues, felt this was a mistake and to some extent undermined PCS strength as an independent trade union able to pursue its industrial aims on its own should it need to do so. A period of gloom was ended with a successful strike on May 10th.
Earlier this week, Mark Serwotka addressed the PCS Revenue & Customs Group Conference on the way forward for our pension and other campaigns. I felt that there was a subtext to his comments, which could be interpreted as moving towards a merger with UNITE. He said the pension dispute cannot be won by PCS taking action alone and without the support of other unions. The PCS is now, due to job cuts in the Civil Service, losing both members and subscription income. This means the Union must review its spending and how it undertakes the task of representing members. The threat of privatisation and the introduction of private sector providers to undertake Civil Service, means a further decrease in membership. However, this could be prevented by recruiting the workers in those companies into PCS. We would need the help and experience of unions that organise in the private sector, and guess who that would be – UNITE.
The National PCS Conference has debated a ‘closer working’ agreement with UNITE. In my experience, ‘closer working’ is a preliminary stage before a formal merger. Union mergers have often been driven by financial pressures. In principle, I am not opposed to a merger with UNITE. I would be concerned that PCS’ culture of being an activist or membership led union is at risk from the hierarchical and possibly autocratic set up of UNITE, in which most of the power and decision making is in the hands of National and Regional Full Time Officers.

2 comments:

  1. In my experience in the TU movement a lot of Unite members leave due to lack of representation because of the cosy relationship between the union and management or seek help from other TU's (especially in areas where Unite have sole recognition). Others because of the size have spoken about problems in finding out everyday things such as what branch they belong to or who their reps are. I would be extremely wary of any merger with Unite.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As it stands at the moment I would oppose a merger for obvious reasons being swallowed up by a huge bureaucratic machine.

    Although Unite have moved a bit closer to us politically and that is welcomed, there is a long way to go yet and we need to look at there internal structures and how it would work in practice in other words Unite would have to change significantly before I would be convinced.

    I can see however the logical tactical reason for this when you look at unisons behaviour it would give us more clout but as said its no good if your tied down by huge layers of red tape.

    In addition as already mentions there is the problem of affiliation to the labour party.

    ReplyDelete