Tuesday 29 April 2014

PCS at the crossroads?




The Annual Delegate Conference of the Public & Commercial Services (PCS) held in Brighton between 20th and 22nd May will see a watershed in both the union’s history and that of the movement. It may well be the final Conference of the Union as we know it. The National Executive Committee (NEC) has tabled a motion, if passed, will ultimately lead to a special conference and a membership ballot to agree a merger with UNITE.

The background is somewhat ironic, in that PCS led the way and dragged along other more cautious unions in campaigning, both politically and industrially, against the Government’s austerity agenda, has ended up becoming another victim of those policies.

The Union’s long-term viability has been undermined by job losses and redundancies in the key Civil Service departments, resulting in the loss of 50,000 members in the last 4 years.
The government intends to reduce the size of the civil service to the equivalent of 380,000 full-time staff by 2015. The subscriptions base on which PCS has to operate is diminishing by the year. At the same pension liabilities for PCS, and for its predecessor unions, have created “a black hole”, which could be addressed but would leave PCS a much weaker union. PCS has also put in place plans to reduce the union’s own staff from 255 to 230 by January 2015.

Privatisation of Civil Service functions is an ever increasing threat, in which members’ jobs are sold off to private sector service suppliers. The Commercial section within PCS has grown larger over recent years as a result of out-sourcing. I believe it is in this area where the industrial logic for any merger is found. The experience of UNITE in organising workers in private sector companies, could be said to benefit PCS members facing privatisation of their jobs.

At this time, PCS is facing many challenges from the Government, designed to hamper activists’ ability to represent members in the workplace. The Cabinet Office has instructed departments to restrict paid time off (facilities time) for all elected trade union posts. The impact has been severe, with representatives having to choose between the activities they were elected to carry out, due to the restricted amount of time available to them. Also the use of dedicated trade union rooms and noticeboards are under threat. The most damaging is the demand by Ministers such as Maude, Pickles and Duncan-Smith that departments end the long established system of payment of union fees through the payroll, known as check off. PCS is urgently asking members to sign direct debit mandates, to head off another potential financial crisis for the union. All of these attacks have originated form right-wing groups, such the Taxpayers Alliance, who have the attention of Tory Ministers and dearly wish to remove trade unions from the public sector.

Activists within PCS have become polarised in the responses to the Merger, with many calling for a “NO” vote. There is a feeling that the “membership led” culture of union organisation developed in PCS is under threat from the hierarchical and full-time officer led structure of UNITE. One issue that is causing some concern is UNITE’s relationship with the Labour Party. The hard left want to defend PCS’s, as yet untested, policy of standing or supporting “independent” candidates in elections. UNITE have already stated that in talks on the merger, that no change in their political affiliations will be considered.

PCS’s NEC is at pains to stress that there is no done deal with UNITE, but their statements then go on to advocate what a “force against austerity” the new union will be. However, once the grounds for a merger have been established, especially where finances and the jobs of full-time officers are at stake, the case for a separate PCS diminishes. A merger will also allow the problems and restrictions in union representation in Civil Service workplaces to be addressed by the deployment of full-time union officials.

Activists will have to consider the terms of the PCS – UNITE merger with the utmost of care, as we stand to lose a great deal in terms of being activists in a democratic, membership-led union. However, in view of the dire threats facing PCS we may have to adopt a pragmatic view on merging with UNITE. 


Saturday 5 April 2014

Time for an End to Zero Hours Contracts

In these times of austerity, one of the most blatant forms of exploiting workers is the zero hours contract.

ACAS (1) defines a zero hours contract as:

The term 'zero hours' is not defined in legislation, but is generally understood to be a employment contract between an employer and a worker, which means the employer is not obliged to provide the worker with any minimum working hours, and the worker is not obliged to accept any of the hours offered.
It is important that both the employer and worker are aware of the fact that a zero hours contract can make their relationship different to other employment contract arrangements.

On the surface an employer could claim that these contracts allow them flexibility to bring in extra staff in busy periods. However, in the main they are an abusive practice, which allows employers not to pay their workers when business is slow. I am sure that we have all heard stories of workers, travelling in to work having paid their transport fares, only be told by the boss that there's no work for them today so they have to go home again without any pay for their trouble. How can this be fair, to lone parents and others struggling to earn a living wage?

It is very convenient to employers that zero hour contracts do not contravene national minimum wage legislation or living wage policies. These rates of pay only apply to hours that are worked. A very neat dodge for the modern Scrooges in the employer class.

As part of the TUC's campaign Fair Pay Fortnight from Monday 24 March to Sunday 6 April the scandal of zero hours contracts will be highlighted. The TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady has said:(2)
“The government is failing to address many of the abuses experienced by workers on zero-hours contracts. That’s why we need urgent legislative action to stamp out the growing abuse of workers on these contracts and in other forms of insecure work.

“Individuals working regular hours should be offered a contract containing fixed hours, but they should not have to wait 12 months for increased job and income security.

“The TUC would like the government to go further and ensure that staff on zero-hours contracts are properly rewarded for the flexibility they offer employers and that they get the same basic workplace rights as employees.

The Labour Party is campaigning on what it calls "Britain's cost of living crisis". Those workers on zero hour contracts bear the brunt of this crisis. I believe that Labour should make an unequivocal manifesto pledge to outlaw this cynical employment practice. In this way, they could win back millions of votes from working class people.

But beyond Labour and the TUC, there is action that we can all take. It is no secret that many well-known retailers and shops on the High Street employ staff on zero hours contracts. Supposedly, in the free market we are all customers and therefore have the choice to patronise those businesses with fair employment policies. It is now the time to name, shame and boycott those who don't!


(1) http://www.acas.org.uk
(2) http://www.tuc.org.uk/industrial-issues/tuc-calls-tougher-action-zero-hours-contracts